“Ouvi dizer que “a nuvem é o novo preto” durante uma sessão de treinamento dentro do escritório do Google. Você pode adivinhar que isso significa que a nuvem é básica. Mas por que eles disseram isso? O Google não forjou essa frase linda. Gartner fez. O que o Gartner quer dizer com “nuvem é o novo preto”? Em termos curtos, o Gartner disse que o mercado de nuvens é um mercado de US $ 1 trilhão. No momento, são apenas US $ 56 bilhões. O Google repete isso para fins comerciais, é claro. Os motivos são os mesmos da Microsoft, da AWS e de qualquer outro provedor de nuvem: escalabilidade, estabilidade, abstração dos processos de infraestrutura e o mesmo bla bla bla. E eu concordo totalmente com as razões deles. Mas, sem considerar essas questões técnicas, para os resultados comerciais finais $$$, por que a nuvem é tão básica?”
Esse trecho faz parte do artigo do Guilherme Sesterheim, US Operations Manager aqui na ilegra. Veja o artigo na íntegra:
I heard “cloud is the new black” during a training session inside a Google’s office. You can guess it means that cloud is basic. But why did they say it? Google didn’t forge this beautiful sentence. Gartner did.
What Gartner means by “cloud is the new black”? In short terms, Gartner said the cloud Market is a US$ 1 trillion Market. Right now it’s just US$ 56 billion.
Google repeats that for comercial purposes of course. The reasons are the same Microsoft, AWS and any other cloud provider do: scalability, stability, abstraction of infrastructure processes, and the same bla bla bla. And I totally agree with their reasons. But without considering this technical questions, to the final business results $$$, why is the cloud so basic?
How does that come to our business?
Yes, there are already a lot of companies moving to cloud and starting their applications inside the cloud. But I still can easily find many companies still not even considering the cloud move. Inside my reality it’s hard to understand. How can they not see cloud benefits? How can they still use their machines and spend millions of dollars buying more and more storage every 6 months? For me it’s waste of time. I’ll explain why.
The rooms where the machines are hosted. They cost Money. For few companies, I’ve already seen very expensive entire blocks inside noble areas like São Paulo being used to host… machines. They don’t need the datacenter to be that close to the offices. The latency doesn’t matter that much. I’m 100% sure. For sure if they remove everything there, and rent the space, the renting revenues will pay for a big slice of cloud cost monthly. What if they sell it? It would mean investments for areas that are needing that Money to innovate and be in front of their competitors. Because of that lack of money, their areas are wasting time. It’s waste of time.
Recently a datacenter, close to the company where I work had a fire issue. Many governmental and private companies, core and non-core systems, were affected. And where were the backups? Inside the same building. Because of the fire, the fireman and police didn’t allow the technical team to get there and move the information to another datacenter. The replication wasn’t automatized. It caused more than 12h of unavailable systems. Can you imagine any company inside any industry without receiving transactions during 12h? Imagine the financial area. Hard. Now imagine a factory without systems for 12h. They won’t sell for a whole day? You could answer “Yeah, but we can ‘take notes’”. The employees don’t remember how to hold a pen this far. They also won’t know how much they produced of what they produce. They won’t know how much they spent producing things. But the main thing here is the overhead that will be created inside those companies to put everything back to systems. Talking about Brazil they can even get a ticket from government because of some missing transactions on that day. What all that means? Waste of time.
Why not cloud?
I have a client who runs a retail solution on cloud. The solution has been running for the last 2 years without downtime. Is it a core solution to their business? No, it’s not. But the fact that they don’t have headaches with that small system saves them time to think on other things. Saves tickets on traditional infrastructure teams. Saves their mental health also. Of course the cloud itself is not the only answer for the application stability. They do care about quality on their development process. Then all these benefits come easily.
When will companies decide to migrate to cloud?
It all makes me think that using cloud is related to maturity. Now a quick link with internet-related startups: companies who grow unbelievable percentages every year in the entire world. The biggest part of them has the cloud in common. Most of their business models wouldn’t be possible without the cloud.
The traditional companies, which already felt startups “bothering” their market shares, are moving, or already moved to cloud.
Why does that happen? Because the cloud gives them the speed they need. Things I’ve already seen in on-premise VS cloud environments:
A new environment to create a new app can take up to 1 month to be released by the infrastructure team to the development team to start work. It’s one month less on that project. Within cloud it’s solved in less than an hour.
Analytics information being generated only with the data considering the day before the current. In cloud you can have live information to take your decisions.
Analyzing petabytes of data without having to do that on the weekend, when there’s no concurrency with other systems running. In cloud you can do that whenever you want without buying millions of dollars of infrastructure in advance.
All these examples want to say the same thing: when the companies start feeling they are being left behind because they are slower than their competitors (either it is a startup or not), they will change.
So, why cloud is the new black?
So… Getting back, why cloud is the new black? Because it means saving time. Because if this text made you remember of any issue you are having, or you may have inside your company, it means you will run after it to solve. It won’t be a short run to find all the responsible for everything and asking them to change to your new conceptions. It will take weeks. Months at least. Those weeks or months spent by the team looking to fix or prevent something to happen, means weeks or months not looking to improve the business, not looking to be in front of competitors. The IT area is not the support anymore. It can’t JUST be prepared to whatever the other areas will demand. It HAS to be the one of the leading business areas. And why that is true? The IT guys know what technology can do. The other areas don’t.